Who Consumes The Most Tobacco and Alcohol

With spending habits waning amid soaring interestrates and rising gas prices, it is perhaps useful to note the trends in the stickiest of spending habits - tobacco, alcohol, and fast food...

Norway tops the heap in terms of alcohol and tobacco spend...

Happiness

“People always think that happiness is a faraway thing," thought Francie, "something complicated and hard to get. Yet, what little things can make it up; a place of shelter when it rains - a cup of strong hot coffee when you're blue; for a man, a cigarette for contentment; a book to read when you're alone - just to be with someone you love. Those things make happiness.”

― Betty Smith, A Tree Grows in Brooklyn

Female Smoking

Latest reports show female smokers make up nearly 20 percent of the world’s tobacco smokers, and that figure is likely to grow due to successful ad campaigns targeting women, with consumption growing fastest among younger women and girls.
As a result, the rate of deaths among this population is also likely to grow – adding to the 5 million who now die each year worldwide from tobacco use and passive smoking. The WHO says the number could reach 8 million deaths by 2030.
To combat the millions the tobacco industry spends each year on ads, health advocates are now trying to step up public awareness campaigns along with anti-smoking restrictions, taxes and bans, especially in low income, developing nations with few controls.

 What’s Behind the Surprise Global Spike in Female Smoking?

Cigar vs. Cigarette: Cultural Difference

Cigar smoking is often considered as a more refined as cigarette smoking. Cigars are mostly popular in the US than in other parts of the world, with about 2.2% of adult consuming them. They are in a greater demand among men than women. They are often used in caricatures of wealthy people and symbolize masculinity and strength.

20% of adults in the US smoke cigarettes, although this rate has been decreasing since the 1960s. Also cigarette smoking is considered less sophisticated that cigar smoking. Nowadays people pay attention mostly on the health risks of cigarettes use than cigar smoking as the first are considered more popular. At present it is prohibited to smoke both cigar and cigarettes at workplaces, restaurants, stores and many public places.

Biology Nicotiana

There are many species of tobacco, which are encompassed by the genus of herbs Nicotiana. It is part of the nightshade family (Solanaceae) indigenous to North and South America, Australia, south west Africa and the South Pacific. Many plants contain nicotine, a powerful neurotoxin, that is particularly harmful to insects. However, tobaccos contain a higher concentration of nicotine than most other plants. Unlike many other Solanaceae, they do not contain tropane alkaloids, which are often poisonous to humans and other animals.

Despite containing enough nicotine and other compounds such as germacrene and anabasine and other piperidine alkaloids (varying between species) to deter most herbivores, a number of such animals have evolved the ability to feed on Nicotiana species without being harmed. Nonetheless, tobacco is unpalatable to many species, and therefore some tobacco plants (chiefly tree tobacco, N. glauca) have become established as invasive weeds in some places.

Wath is Second-hand smoke?

Second-hand tobacco smoke is the smoke emitted from the burning end of a cigarette (also known as ‘side-stream smoke’) or from other tobacco products, in combination with the ‘mainstream smoke’ exhaled by the smoker. Second-hand smoke (SHS) is variously called involuntary smoking, passive smoking and environmental tobacco smoke.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer has declared SHS as carcinogenic.124 Article 8 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) focuses on “protection from exposure to tobacco smoke” and signatories to the FCTC have agreed to recognise that “scientific evidence has unequivocally established that exposure to tobacco smoke causes death, disease and disability.” Signatories agreed to adopt effective legislation in order to provide protection from second-hand smoke in indoor workplaces, public transport, indoor public places and, as appropriate, other public places.
In 2002, before the introduction of smoke-free policies, second-hand smoking at work appeared to account for over 7,000 deaths across the EU every year. Second-hand smoking at home appeared to account for 72,000 deaths per year. Since the introduction of smoke-free policies, a Cochrane review by Callinan et al. has found consistent evidence of reduced exposure to SHS in workplaces, restaurants, pubs and in public places. Callinan et al. also found consistent evidence of a reduction in cardiac events as well as some improvement in other health indicators after the introduction of smoke-free legislation. In Scotland, following the introduction of smoke-free legislation covering all enclosed places, hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome decreased by 17%, compared with only a 4% decrease in England (where the legislation was not in place at the time).
Although 67% of the decrease involved non-smokers, fewer admissions among smokers also contributed to the overall reduction. A study in northern Italy (Piedmont region) reported the number of admissions for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) decreased significantly after the introduction of the smoke-free legislation: from 922 cases in February-June 2004 to 832 cases in February-June 2005 (sex- and age-adjusted rate ratio, 0.89; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.81-0.98 in those aged under 60 years). The authors postulated the effects on AMI admissions might be due to the reduction of passive smoking.
In Italy, after the smoke-free legislation there was a statistically significant reduction in acute coronary events in the adult population, suggesting that public interventions that prohibit smoking can have enormous public health implications.

Defendants liability

Defendants complain that the district court failed to identify the racketeering acts that support the finding of liability. While 27 it is true the district court’s opinion provided no single, discrete list of specific racketeering acts, the comprehensive findings— detailing over one-hundred racketeering acts—are sufficient to warrant affirmance.
Defendants raise numerous challenges to the correctness of the district court’s findings that they committed racketeering acts, which we take up in Parts III and IV. In this section, however, we are concerned only with the existence of these findings, not their validity. By statutory definition, any violation of the mail or wire fraud statutes can qualify as “racketeering activity.”
To prove a violation of the mail and wire fraud statutes, the government must show a scheme or artifice to defraud and a mailing or wire transmission in furtherance thereof. “Where one scheme involves several mailings, the law is settled that each mailing constitutes a violation of the statute.”
Where, as here, the mail and wire fraud statutes serve as the predicate offenses for a RICO violation, each racketeering act must be a mailing or wire transmission made in furtherance of a “scheme or artifice to defraud.” Thus, in order to identify the racketeering acts, the district court must first have found a scheme to defraud, then concluded the alleged mailings or wire transmissions were in furtherance of such scheme.